What is not strategy

3457 reads

Managers use the word  strategy  very often. Yet there is considerable confusion about what it means and how to use it effectively. This is the first in a series of articles in which   Mr. Bhattacharya explores the misconceptions about Strategy

Strategy is necessary to make a firm competitive. This ignorance is dangerous in the fiercely competitive 

world of business today.  There is no other way to create wealth for shareholders and society. It is an absolute imperative for survival. It is, therefore, even harder to understand why managers responsible for the health of the corporation carry erroneous notions about it.



Most managers learn on the job. Their lack of understanding of strategy often reflects the leadership's discomfort with abstract concepts. It is a manifestation of their preference for the tangible and the specific. Quite often it is conditioned by their preoccupation with results and action. They lead to errors in what managers come to believe is strategy. There are five common misconceptions. They arise from mixing strategies with results, action, scale, operational efficiencies and risk mitigation. Let us see how each one clouds a manager's vision.


1. Confusing Strategy with Outcome.


A common error is confusing ends with means. It leads to strategies that read so: ‘our strategy will be to become the most admired company in our industry'; or, ‘to become a leader' in it. It may be stated as grow at a compounded annual growth rate of 15%; achieve revenue of 100 billion, increase market share or profitability to X%, and so on. These are not strategies. They are consequences. They are outcomes of competitiveness resulting from effective strategies.


A firm's turnover, market share or reputation grows when customers prefer to do business with them. Customers become predisposed to buy the company's products when they perceive greater or more unique value for the price they pay. To deliver greater value to customers the company must develop a game plan and execute is successfully.


The manner in which the firm gains the favour of customers is  business strategy   , also called  competitive strategy   . One company may do so by designing stylish products that are affordable, as Swatch does. Another might sell a functional detergent at a low price, like Nirma. Yet another may succeed hugely by combining superb quality at very attractive low prices. India is the best example of this strategy in providing offshore IT services to the world.


Each of them has used strategy to achieve desired ends - revenue, growth, profitability and reputation. In each case strategy has helped them give customers a compelling reason to buy their products or services. Means were crafted to reach where they wanted to go.  The goal is not strategy.


2. The Fallacy of Action.


Action is confused with strategy. This is perhaps the most common error. Managers tend to answer the question ‘How shall we achieve growth?' by offering a number of alternative actions. Let's enter new markets. Or, train sales engineers to sell better. Increase the number of calls sales people make. Introduce new products. Do something......anything!


Most industrial societies profess action orientation. The West drew it's inspiration from the Protestant work ethic. In other cultures, India for instance, business is greatly influenced if not shaped by western practices. Managers who are pragmatic, quick off the starting block & get things done are praised. Those who think are considered lazy. Action orientation is good for one's career. Recruiters actively look for such people. Hardly anyone hires ‘people who think'. Is it any wonder that strategy meetings lead to divergent ideas with nothing in common among them? The process is given the respectable name ‘brain storming'.


Strategists ask three questions: Where, How and What.   ‘Where' leads to the destination, the end they seek. Answers to ‘How' are the domain of strategy. They provide clues to the means by which the desired result may be achieved. ‘How' does not tell them what to do. It merely suggests the direction and the manner in which the goal may be accomplished.


‘What' prescribes activities that must be performed to achieve the stated goal by the means identified in strategy. Actions must flow from strategy if they are to remain consistent over time. Managers should be able to inventively use resources - cash, people, assets, etc. - to execute strategy. The activities that use these resources are the realm of tactics. They are not strategy.


It is true that our experience tells us which actions might succeed and which might not. They help us craft viable strategies. In that sense, strategy is the outcome of knowledge gained from past action. But it is the insight gained from activity, and not the activity itself, that helps us formulate strategy.


Tactics and strategy go hand in hand. Action is necessary to bring strategy to fruition. But without a game plan action, no matter how diligent, will not lead to the desired goal except by chance. Sun Tzu, the Chinese philosopher, put it perfectly, "Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat."


To be continued in the next issue..... 


vn_bhattacharya.jpg Mr. V.N. Bhattacharya is a management consultant on business and corporate strategy.  Feedback can be mailed to marketinggyan@businessgyan.com


Issue BG59 Feb06


misner's picture

Dude, Where are my Wheels? Why Networking Helps – Even in the “Hood”

I recently visited Los Angeles and drove through an area that I grew up around.  I was regaling my wife with a story about a job I had in a pretty tough neighborhood when I was in college.  At the end of the story she said, “you have to
Harvey Mackay's picture

Resourcefulness = “Of Coursefulness”

A firm needed a researcher. Applicants were a scientist, an engineer and an economist. Each was given a stone, a piece of string and a stopwatch and told to determine a certain building’s height. The scientist went to the rooftop, tied the stone to
johnsullivan's picture

Sourcing Is the New Recruiting

I have some excellent news for you. Sourcing is the place to be in talent acquisition today! Recruiting as it has traditionally been known is going away. Increasingly companies are adopting recruitment process automation, and that means that there
harvardbusinessreview's picture

How to Prepare for a Panel

Make sure to connect with the moderator beforehand.
johnsullivan's picture

HR Roundtable: The Value of a Multi-Generational Workforce

In the classic rock anthem My Generation by The Who, lead singer Roger Daltrey screams, “I hope I die before I get old.” He echoed a sentiment of the times, but he never knew that he was also doing what...
adamgrant's picture

Why Women Volunteer for Tasks That Don’t Lead to Promotions

Here’s a work scenario many of us know too well: You are in a meeting and your manager brings up a project that needs to be assigned. It’s not particularly challenging work, but it’s time-consuming, unlikely to drive revenue, and probably won’t be
johnsullivan's picture

How Personas Change Sourcing Outcomes

It’s really intimidating to walk into a room full of people you don’t know. We’ve all had that moment of panic, scanning the room for any semi-familiar face and praying it’ll work. Just one person. I personally hate that feeling....
misner's picture

Body Language When Networking

Body language can be a powerful attractant or deterrent when it comes to building relationships with others. People assess you visually within the first fewminutes of meeting you.  I’ve been asked a lot about body language by the media over the
adamgrant's picture

This 4-Day Work Week Experiment Went So Well, the Company is Keeping It

A first-of-its-kind four-day work week experiment in New Zealand has come to an end after two months, but the trial went so well the company actually wants to make the changes permanent.While lots of research has shown the numerous benefits a