Is doing nothing a strategy?

542 reads

Sometime in 2012, a small company in Tamil Nadu (India) developed manure containing natural plant growth hormones, from seaweed. The gel had to be diluted with appropriate quantity of water before being applied to the soil. Quite quickly the company established a niche with a volume of approximately 10 MT per month.

Lure of profits 

Soon, two new players sensing an opportunity entered the same market. They introduced slightly inferior but cheaper products. Suddenly threatened, the first player mulled over several choices before the company, as below:

• Reduce prices and match the competition.

• Hire more sales people and appoint dealers in new regions.

• Increase dealer margin, advertise and run promotions.

• Reposition the product and charge a premium.

• Sue competitors on grounds of IPR infringement.

• Sit tight, do nothing, and hope for the best.

After much deliberation, the company decided to do nothing. It merely asked sales people to emphasise to dealers the superior quality and performance of their product. Surprisingly, sales quadrupled within a year.

The inertia paradox 

Pleasant surprise? Was the loss of market share to new entrants, who were growing themselves, worth it? It is clear the incumbent could not have grown the market on its own and sell four times more per month as quickly as it did. Considering it did nothing the outcome was certainly a pleasant one. But what explains this paradox?

Competition expands markets 

Entry of competition expanded the market. Suddenly there were three players promoting a relatively new concept and product category. They expanded the distribution network, and encouraged farmers to try the product. The market was evolving faster than when there was a single producer. And it was segmenting on the back of price and performance. The pioneer could not have achieved any of it alone.

Strategy lessons 

There are several lessons here for strategists.

First, competition is valuable. They help expand markets and catalyse growth. We should be able to discern when they help and when they do not.

Second, competition helps markets evolve and segment more quickly than in the hands of a monopoly operator. It offers incumbents the opportunity to fine tune offerings and position themselves.

Three, doing nothing can also be a good strategy.

Welcome competition 

Finally, bringing in players can be good for the health of a business especially in a nascent market. In this case it happened serendipitously. But astute strategists can proactively instigate the entry of new players – competitors, suppliers, and customers – for long-term gains.


johnsullivan's picture

Sourcing Is the New Recruiting

I have some excellent news for you. Sourcing is the place to be in talent acquisition today! Recruiting as it has traditionally been known is going away. Increasingly companies are adopting recruitment process automation, and that means that there
harvardbusinessreview's picture

How to Prepare for a Panel

Make sure to connect with the moderator beforehand.
johnsullivan's picture

HR Roundtable: The Value of a Multi-Generational Workforce

In the classic rock anthem My Generation by The Who, lead singer Roger Daltrey screams, “I hope I die before I get old.” He echoed a sentiment of the times, but he never knew that he was also doing what...
adamgrant's picture

Why Women Volunteer for Tasks That Don’t Lead to Promotions

Here’s a work scenario many of us know too well: You are in a meeting and your manager brings up a project that needs to be assigned. It’s not particularly challenging work, but it’s time-consuming, unlikely to drive revenue, and probably won’t be
johnsullivan's picture

How Personas Change Sourcing Outcomes

It’s really intimidating to walk into a room full of people you don’t know. We’ve all had that moment of panic, scanning the room for any semi-familiar face and praying it’ll work. Just one person. I personally hate that feeling....
misner's picture

Body Language When Networking

Body language can be a powerful attractant or deterrent when it comes to building relationships with others. People assess you visually within the first fewminutes of meeting you.  I’ve been asked a lot about body language by the media over the
johnsullivan's picture

Accenture Is Using Tech to Make Onboarding a Personal Experience

Normally I think of onboarding along two dimensions: efficiently handling the administrative work and welcoming a person onto the team so they can be effective. Onboarding, even the basic administrative work, can be hard to do, and technology can
vnbhattacharya's picture

NARCOS and the game beyond the game

A critical aspect of strategic thinking is the ability to determine one's strategy in the game at hand by anticipating games in the future. It is especially important to foresee games that may be spawned by playing the game one is offered now.Such
sethgodin's picture

Big crew/little crew

Software projects work better with small teams. On the other hand, it makes sense to have multiple teams of workers if you're paving a patch of highly trafficked highway. Three reasons: Coordination Learning Ramp up time As we learned from...